Casualty
(6)
We
purchased our annual timeshare in the late 90's. At the time I
recall specifically asking the salesperson “what happens if we
don't want it for the entire 40 years of the contract?” We were
told it would be easy to sell, transfer to a family member, or that
the resort would purchase it back for a percentage of the purchase
price (a clause stating that percentage was even written into our
contract back then, but the more recent contracts do not include that
clause).
Fifteen
(15) years into our contract, our situation changed and we weren't
using it as much as we had previously, so we had some friends offer
to buy it from us. In December of 2012 we contacted Sunchaser to
arrange the transfer of ownership and they sent the forms required to
do so. One of those forms was an “acknowledgement of liability”
form that we, the “current owners” were required to sign. It
stated “____ hereby acknowledge that if the transferee does not
meet the payment obligations that are set out in the Vacation
Interval Agreement that I/We remain liable with respect to future
payment obligations not made by the transferee”. In other words we
were still on the hook if the new owners defaulted on any payments.
We noticed that this new document was written in November of 2012
(one month prior to our contacting them). Needless to say, we
weren't comfortable with this arrangement, so we requested that
Sunchaser offer to purchase our timeshare back from us. We received
no response from them, but a couple of weeks later we received a
letter from them announcing the renovation and what we would be
required to pay for such capital improvements.
We
were not prepared to pay the reno fee as we did not want the
timeshare any longer, however we felt that we shouldn't have to “pay
to relinquish” a timeshare that they could then rent out for
profit. And our contract did not say anywhere that we would have to
pay them to leave. We have friends and relatives who have owned
timeshares in numerous other resorts and when they could no longer
use them, they just stopped paying their fees and gave the unit back.
No penalty whatsoever, obviously a properly run, reputable resort
would be happy to take it back and re-sell it. More money for them!
We
were confident that our contract protected us from these fees and
from them charging us to give it back, so joined the Geldert group to
oppose it. Never in our wildest dreams did we imagine that the
courts would side with them and even allow our contracts to be
changed without our permission. It is just so wrong. We also felt
that if they bought a resort that was in need of such major
improvements that was their choice and they couldn't expect us to
make up for their bad investment. I believe they knew from the onset
that they could squeeze money out of everyone. They had covered
their bases and had some slick lawyers advising them.
We
put our faith in our legal system and refused the “settlement
offers” but now we are at a point of being worn down, done,
disillusioned and fed up. We will find a way to pay our way out
never to have to deal with this company again. We are disgusted that
they can get away with so many crooked actions and know how to find
the loop holes in the system. We hope and pray that somewhere along
the way, something good can come of this. We know it is too late for
us and it is a very tough pill to swallow but hopefully others in the
future will be spared this stress and heartache. We feel for those
who “paid to stay” and especially those sucked into the “Legacy
for Life” as they have open wallets now and can be charged for
pretty much anything the management wants now. We may have to pay
for five (5) years of maintenance fees for a resort we weren't able
to use, a renovation fee for renos that would never benefit us and a
lofty exist fee, but at least we are no longer tied to this nightmare
and they can't hurt us again.
The
information contained in this blog/video is accurate to the best of my
knowledge at the time of posting. I reserve the right to make changes as
new information becomes available.
Any and all information I share is for informational purposes only, not legal advice, as I am not a lawyer, just a lay person sharing information.
Any and all information I share is for informational purposes only, not legal advice, as I am not a lawyer, just a lay person sharing information.
No comments:
Post a Comment