The Edwards Action - Part Two

To view previous posts/videos please click on the links below.

The Edwards Action - Part One

SuperConference Blog Post

Edwards v Resort Villa Management Ltd, 2015 ABQB 424 (CanLll) 

Partial List of Series of Events for Edwards et al:

June 14, 2013 Filed Statement of Claim

January 17, 2014 Partial Discontinuance  - Removal of Rode
January 21, 2014 Partial Discontinuance - Removal of Malloch

February 21, 2014 Partial Discontinuance - Removal of Schaff

May 2, 2014 Filed Amended Statement of Claim
May 2, 2014 Ackroyds file for Injunction to use resort
May 27, 2014 Interim Injunction granted

July 11, 2014 Northmont filed Statement of Defence and Counterclaim
July 2014 Hirsche file for Injunction to use resort - granted

August 5, 2014 Edwards et al file Statement of Defence to the Counterclaim

January 27, 2015  SuperConference

March 25, 2015 Filed Confirmation of Trial Date for June 1, 2015

May 29, 2015 Edwards et al request an adjournment of June 1, 2015 Trial Date

June 1, 2015 Edwards et al file Notice of Change of Representation
June 11, 2015 Northmont files Brief regarding costs
June 18, 2015 Edwards et al files Brief regarding costs
June 22, 2015 Northmont files rebuttal regarding costs

July 2, 2015 Memorandum of Decision - Honourable Madam Justice M.T. Moreau

September 1, 2015 Judgments filed as follows:

Edwards - $5,011
Hirsche - $17,618
Ackroyd - $4,454
Interest all - $4,500
Costs - $27,334
Total:  $58,917.00

December 23, 2015 Satisfaction Piece filed 

For information not listed here, please watch the video.

 The information contained in this blog is accurate to the best of my knowledge at the time of posting. I reserve the right to make changes as new information becomes available.

Any and all  information I share is for informational purposes only, not legal advice, as I am not a lawyer, just a lay person sharing information.

SUPERCONFERENCE

Get out the popcorn and your favorite beverage and get comfortable because what I am about to share with you in the video is NOT all in the document provided in the link.

SuperConference Transcript 

 The information contained in this blog is accurate to the best of my knowledge at the time of posting. I reserve the right to make changes as new information becomes available.

Any and all  information I share is for informational purposes only, not legal advice, as I am not a lawyer, just a lay person sharing information.

The JEKE Action - Part One

Here are some of the documents I speak about in the video:

For the JEKE Enterprises Ltd. V Northmont Resort Properties Ltd. 
Supreme Court of British Columbia, Victoria Registry #143785

2014 10 08 JEKE V Northmont Notice of Civil Claim  

2014 10 23 JEKE V Northmont - Notice of Application 

2014 10 14 JEKE V Northmont - Application Response 

2014 10 30 Affidavit #1 Kirk Wankel 

I cannot, for the life of me, find that we were provided with Northmont's Reply to Claim that according to the BC Court Registry list I have was filed on November 12, 2014.  I do, however, have the amended ones from 2015 and will provide those once I cover those dates.

For the Northmont Resort Properties Ltd. V JEKE Enterprises Ltd.
Provincial Court of British Columbia, Cranbrook Registry #24549

2014 10 20 Northmont V JEKE Notice of Claim 

2014 10 28 Northmont V JEKE Reply to Claim 

 The information contained in this blog is accurate to the best of my knowledge at the time of posting. I reserve the right to make changes as new information becomes available.

Any and all  information I share is for informational purposes only, not legal advice, as I am not a lawyer, just a lay person sharing information.

Danielle Smith Interview

Here is a link to a radio interview I did on January 10th, 2018 prior to starting this blog.

Danielle Smith: Timeshare laws need to change

 

 The information contained in this blog/video is accurate to the best of my knowledge at the time of posting. I reserve the right to make changes as new information becomes available.

Any and all  information I share is for informational purposes only, not legal advice, as I am not a lawyer, just a lay person sharing information.

The Edwards Action - Part One

The following is a list of the documents I refer to in the video, just click on the one you wish to view and it should open in a new tab for you.

2013 06 14 Edwards Statement of Claim

2014 05 02 Edwards Amended Statement of Claim 

2014 06 19 Interim Injunction Order 

2014 07 11 Northmont Statement of Defence 

2014 07 11 Northmont Counterclaim 

2014 08 05 Edwards Statement of Defence to Counterclaim 

The information contained in this blog is accurate to the best of my knowledge at the time of posting. I reserve the right to make changes as new information becomes available.

Any and all  information I share is for informational purposes only, not legal advice, as I am not a lawyer, just a lay person sharing information. 

The Merriman Action

Here is the document I refer to in the video - SCBC 134766 Civil Claim

 The information contained in this blog is accurate to the best of my knowledge at the time of posting. I reserve the right to make changes as new information becomes available.

Any and all  information I share is for informational purposes only, not legal advice, as I am not a lawyer, just a lay person sharing information.

The Petition

The information contained in this blog is accurate to the best of my knowledge at the time of posting. I reserve the right to make changes as new information becomes available.

Any and all  information I share is for informational purposes only, not legal advice, as I am not a lawyer, just a lay person sharing information.

Statute of Limitation

If you feel you have a case as I said in the video you will need to file a Claim in the courts to preserve the date that "you knew or ought to have known".

Although I will be addressing Self Representation more in the future I am providing this guide now for anyone interested  Guide To Civil Litigation for Self Representation

The information contained in this blog is accurate to the best of my knowledge at the time of posting. I reserve the right to make changes as new information becomes available.

Any and all  information I share is for informational purposes only, not legal advice, as I am not a lawyer, just a lay person sharing information.

Claim Filed against Geldert

The following links are the Statement of Claim  and the Reply


Like my page and follow me on Facebook
Follow me on Twitter

 The information contained in this blog is accurate to the best of my knowledge at the time of posting. I reserve the right to make changes as new information becomes available.

Any and all  information I share is for informational purposes only, not legal advice, as I am not a lawyer, just a lay person sharing information.

Follow Up - Disbarred Lawyer

This is a follow up to my previous post of yesterday - Disbarred Lawyer.

Someone on Tuggbs posted the following: 

 Code of Professional Conduct - BC Law Society

Section 6.1-4 (Suspended or disbarred lawyers)

Without the express approval of the lawyer’s governing body, a lawyer must not retain, occupy office space with, use the services of, partner or associate with or employ in any capacity having to do with the practice of law any person who, in any jurisdiction,

(a) has been disbarred and struck off the Rolls,

(b) is suspended,

(c) has undertaken not to practise,

(d) has been involved in disciplinary action and been permitted to resign and has not been reinstated or readmitted,

(e) has failed to complete a Bar admission program for reasons relating to lack of good character and repute or fitness to be a member of the Bar,

(f) has been the subject of a hearing ordered, whether commenced or not, with respect to an application for enrolment as an articled student, call and admission, or reinstatement, unless the person was subsequently enrolled, called and admitted or reinstated in the same jurisdiction, or

(g) was required to withdraw or was expelled from a Bar admission program.

amended Apr 2013

"The rules in this Code should guide the conduct of lawyers, not only in the practice of law, but also in other activities."

https://www.lawsociety.bc.ca/suppor...of-professional-conduct-for-british-columbia/

The information contained in this blog is accurate to the best of my knowledge at the time of posting. I reserve the right to make changes as new information becomes available.

Any and all  information I share is for informational purposes only, not legal advice, as I am not a lawyer, just a lay person sharing information.  

Disbarred Lawyer

Brad Willis

Res Judicata

Abuse of Process

Vexatious Litigation

Meads v Meads 2012 ABQB 571

For the list of Who is Who  

 The information contained in this blog is accurate to the best of my knowledge at the time of posting. I reserve the right to make changes as new information becomes available.

Any and all  information I share is for informational purposes only, not legal advice, as I am not a lawyer, just a lay person sharing information.